So we see that if we have a finite data ``sample'', we can get an
estimate of the true values of
and
. But how far is
our estimate
from the true value
? This is the
central question of every measurement, because it tells us how much
confidence we may put in our result. Measurements without error
ranges are meaningless! For example, there is really no meaning to
the statement that the length of the table top is 3 meters, because
the associated error might be a kilometer. There is meaning only if
we can associate an error with this figure and say, for example, that
the length is 3.00 meters with an error of plus or minus 0.01 meter.
Now suppose we make
measurements to make up one data ``sample'' on
one day and make another
measurements to make a second sample on
the next, and so collect a large number of samples. We determine the
estimated mean value
for each sample. What is the
probability distribution for this estimated mean value? Note that it
is not the same as the probability distribution of the population.
One way to see this is to realize that if we take larger and larger
samples almost all of our values would be expected to be closer and
closer to the true mean
. In fact, a famous theorem of
statistics, called the ``central limit'' theorem states that the
probability distribution of the mean value approaches a Gaussian
normal distribution as the sample size increases, regardless of
whether the underlying population distribution
is itself
Gaussian. The standard deviation of the mean value is estimated by
So as a result of measuring one sample, we estimate the true mean
value to be